Bassdash Autumn Forest camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Bassdash

Autumn Forest
This pattern stands out most for concentrated, with stronger directional imbalance; middle-range overall brightness, low tonal separation; and softer, weaker edge structure.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Spatial Distribution

Concentrated, with stronger directional imbalance
Very low information balance and high left right compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, low tonal separation
Low tonal separation compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Edge Character

Softer, weaker edge structure
Low edge strength and low hard-edge share compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: tan
Warm 97.8%
Cool 2.2%
Neutral 8.8%
Light & Dark
Dark 37.9%
Mid 59.4%
Light 2.7%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 28.3%
Mid 32.4%
Large 39.3%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Tan, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Tan. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, low tonal separation

37.9% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal groups are less distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern does not sit near either brightness extreme of the reference set.

Edge Character

Softer, weaker edge structure

Edge density is typical, average detected edge strength is low, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to transition more gently than in many reference patterns.

Texture Character

Evenly distributed texture

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is high compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture activity is distributed more consistently across the pattern.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is typical, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The effective division of visible regions is broadly typical.

Pattern Scale

Balanced across pattern scales

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

Concentrated, with stronger directional imbalance

Spatial information balance is very low, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are high, typical, and typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Visual activity is more concentrated overall and is also arranged less symmetrically across one or more directions.