CamoMatrix Pattern DNA
Cabelas
Outfitter
This pattern stands out most for mixed edge structure; smooth, evenly distributed texture; and less fragmented, more elongated.
The dominant detected color families are Brown / Tan. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.
What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.
34.2% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal groups are less distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.
What you may notice:
The pattern does not sit near either brightness extreme of the reference set.
Edge density is very low, average detected edge strength is low, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is typical relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to transition more gently than in many reference patterns.
Fine texture density is very low, roughness is very low, and texture uniformity is high compared with the reference set.
What you may notice:
Texture activity is distributed more consistently across the pattern.
Effective retained-region fragmentation is low, while average retained-region elongation is very high relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
The visible structure is concentrated into fewer effective regions than in many reference patterns.
The analyzer classifies dominant scale as macro. Fine-scale energy is very low, mid-scale energy is low, and large-scale energy is very high relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
Large visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.
Spatial information balance is low, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are typical, typical, and typical relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
More of the pattern activity is concentrated into particular portions of the sample.
This pattern appears best aligned with middle-brightness overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation and tan dry grass, vegetation, bark, or exposed earth. Its lower tonal separation should fit flatter, more blended backgrounds. Its large-scale structure favors backgrounds containing broader visual masses and structural features. Its smoother, more uniform texture aligns with backgrounds whose surface detail remains relatively consistent.
Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to strongly broken or high-contrast backgrounds and backgrounds dominated only by tiny repetitive detail.
The pattern contains relatively few detected edges. Its visible forms are less fragmented and more elongated. Visual activity is distributed less evenly across the pattern.
How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.
These are the closest measured matches based on Pattern DNA color, tone, texture, shape, scale and layout.
See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.
