Huntworth Gear Tarnen camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Huntworth Gear

Tarnen
This pattern stands out most for more spatially concentrated; middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation; and mixed edge structure.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Spatial Distribution

More spatially concentrated
Very low rotational 180 and very low top bottom compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation
High tonal range and high tonal separation compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure
High edge density compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: gray
Warm 100%
Cool 0%
Neutral 8.2%
Light & Dark
Dark 38.9%
Mid 48.5%
Light 12.6%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 31.6%
Mid 31.4%
Large 37%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Gray, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Gray. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation

38.9% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its dark, mid, and light tonal groups are more distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern does not sit near either brightness extreme of the reference set.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is high, average detected edge strength is typical, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Boundary strength is broadly typical of the reference set.

Texture Character

Rougher texture character

Fine texture density is high, roughness is high, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.

Shape Character

More fragmented, typical elongation

Effective retained-region fragmentation is high, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is divided among more effective regions rather than being concentrated into fewer dominant regions.

Pattern Scale

Balanced across pattern scales

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

More spatially concentrated

Spatial information balance is low, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are typical, very low, and very low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
More of the pattern activity is concentrated into particular portions of the sample.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with middle-brightness overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation and gray rock, bark, dead wood, or neutral material. Its stronger light-and-dark separation should fit backgrounds with broken tonal variation. Its balanced scale favors backgrounds containing a mixture of visual detail sizes. Its fine texture aligns with backgrounds containing substantial small surface detail.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to flat or low-contrast backgrounds.

Breakup Character

The pattern contains a relatively dense network of detected edges. Its visible structure is relatively fragmented. Visual activity is distributed less evenly across the pattern.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.