King's Camo Desert Shadow camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

King's Camo

Desert Shadow
This pattern stands out most for balanced across pattern scales; more spatially concentrated; and mixed edge structure.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Pattern Scale

Balanced across pattern scales
Very high scale balance compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Spatial Distribution

More spatially concentrated
Very low information balance and low left right compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure
High edge density compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: gray
Warm 99.8%
Cool 0.2%
Neutral 12.5%
Light & Dark
Dark 42.2%
Mid 54%
Light 3.7%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 34.6%
Mid 32.9%
Large 32.4%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Gray, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Gray. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, typical tonal separation

42.2% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal-group separation is within the broad middle of the reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern does not sit near either brightness extreme of the reference set.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is high, average detected edge strength is typical, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Boundary strength is broadly typical of the reference set.

Texture Character

Typical texture character

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is typical, while average retained-region elongation is low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The effective division of visible regions is broadly typical.

Pattern Scale

Balanced across pattern scales

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

More spatially concentrated

Spatial information balance is very low, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are low, typical, and typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
More of the pattern activity is concentrated into particular portions of the sample.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with middle-brightness overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation and gray rock, bark, dead wood, or neutral material. Its balanced scale favors backgrounds containing a mixture of visual detail sizes.

Where It May Struggle

No strong opposite-condition warning is indicated by the current profile.

Breakup Character

The pattern contains a relatively dense network of detected edges. Visual activity is distributed less evenly across the pattern.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.