King's Camo Xk7 camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

King's Camo

Xk7
This pattern stands out most for typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance; middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation; and mixed edge structure.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Spatial Distribution

Typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance
Very low left right and high top bottom compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation
High tonal separation compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure
High hard-edge share compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: black
Warm 87.5%
Cool 12.5%
Neutral 28.5%
Light & Dark
Dark 49.8%
Mid 42%
Light 8.3%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 27.7%
Mid 31.7%
Large 40.6%
Dominant scale: macro

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Black, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Black. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Middle-range overall brightness, high tonal separation

49.8% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its dark, mid, and light tonal groups are more distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern does not sit near either brightness extreme of the reference set.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is typical, average detected edge strength is typical, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Boundary strength is broadly typical of the reference set.

Texture Character

Variable texture distribution

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is low compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture activity changes noticeably from one part of the pattern to another.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is typical, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The effective division of visible regions is broadly typical.

Pattern Scale

Large-scale dominant

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as macro. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Large visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.

Spatial Distribution

Typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance

Spatial information balance is typical, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are very low, high, and high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The overall spread of visual activity is fairly typical, but its arrangement is less symmetrical across one or more directions.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with middle-brightness overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation. Its stronger light-and-dark separation should fit backgrounds with broken tonal variation. Its large-scale structure favors backgrounds containing broader visual masses and structural features. Its variable texture also aligns with terrain where surface detail changes noticeably across the scene.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to flat or low-contrast backgrounds and backgrounds dominated only by tiny repetitive detail.

Breakup Character

The pattern shows relatively stronger spatial asymmetry.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Most Similar Patterns

These are the closest measured matches based on Pattern DNA color, tone, texture, shape, scale and layout.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.