Kryptek Obskura Grom camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Kryptek

Obskura Grom
This pattern stands out most for gray / Tan, very low saturation; brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation; and dense, strong edge structure.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Color Character

Gray / Tan, very low saturation
Very low saturation compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Light & Dark Structure

Brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation
Very high overall brightness and very low dark-area share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Edge Character

Dense, strong edge structure
Very high edge density and high edge strength compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: gray
Secondary: tan
Warm 95.8%
Cool 4.2%
Neutral 59.4%
Light & Dark
Dark 4.9%
Mid 42%
Light 53.1%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 40.6%
Mid 32.2%
Large 27.2%
Dominant scale: micro

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Gray / Tan, very low saturation

The dominant detected color families are Gray / Tan. Its average color saturation is very low compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern tends to read as muted or low-color rather than strongly colorful.

Light & Dark Structure

Brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation

4.9% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal-group separation is within the broad middle of the reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads bright at a glance.

Edge Character

Dense, strong edge structure

Edge density is very high, average detected edge strength is high, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to remain visually pronounced where they occur.

Texture Character

Rougher texture character

Fine texture density is very high, roughness is high, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is high, while average retained-region elongation is very low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is divided among more effective regions rather than being concentrated into fewer dominant regions.

Pattern Scale

Fine-scale dominant

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as micro. Fine-scale energy is high, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Small-scale visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.

Spatial Distribution

More spatially concentrated

Spatial information balance is very low, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are very low, very low, and very low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
More of the pattern activity is concentrated into particular portions of the sample.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with brighter or paler overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing tan dry grass, vegetation, bark, or exposed earth and gray rock, bark, dead wood, or neutral material. Its fine-scale structure favors backgrounds containing substantial small, repeated visual detail. Its fine texture aligns with backgrounds containing substantial small surface detail.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to very dark backgrounds and very broad or visually simple backgrounds.

Breakup Character

The pattern contains a relatively dense network of detected edges with stronger boundary definition. Its visible structure is relatively fragmented. Visual activity is distributed less evenly across the pattern.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.