Rothco Fred Bear camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Rothco

Fred Bear
This pattern stands out most for darker than most patterns, low tonal separation; more fragmented, typical elongation; and balanced, with a fine-scale lean.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, low tonal separation
Very low tonal range and low overall brightness compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Shape Character

More fragmented, typical elongation
Very high shape fragmentation compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Pattern Scale

Balanced, with a fine-scale lean
Very low large-scale structure and very high mid-scale structure compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: gray
Secondary: brown
Warm 88%
Cool 12%
Neutral 13.2%
Light & Dark
Dark 57.5%
Mid 41.6%
Light 0.9%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 39.4%
Mid 43%
Large 17.6%
Dominant scale: balanced

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Gray / Brown, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Gray / Brown. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Darker than most patterns, low tonal separation

57.5% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal groups are less distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads dark at a glance.

Edge Character

Typical edge structure

Edge density is typical, average detected edge strength is typical, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Boundary strength is broadly typical of the reference set.

Texture Character

Typical texture character

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.

Shape Character

More fragmented, typical elongation

Effective retained-region fragmentation is very high, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is divided among more effective regions rather than being concentrated into fewer dominant regions.

Pattern Scale

Balanced, with a fine-scale lean

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as balanced. Fine-scale energy is high, mid-scale energy is very high, and large-scale energy is very low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
No single scale band dominates strongly enough to define the pattern by itself.

Spatial Distribution

Evenly distributed

Spatial information balance is very high, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are typical, typical, and typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Visual activity is spread relatively evenly across the sampled pattern.