Sportschief Moose camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Sportschief

Moose
This pattern stands out most for very dark, very low tonal separation; mixed edge structure; and smoother texture character.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Light & Dark Structure

Very dark, very low tonal separation
Very low overall brightness and very high dark-area share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure
Very low edge density and very low edge strength compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Texture Character

Smoother texture character
Very low fine-texture density and very low texture roughness compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: brown
Secondary: black
Warm 99.9%
Cool 0.1%
Neutral 1.9%
Light & Dark
Dark 80.5%
Mid 19.3%
Light 0.2%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 19.5%
Mid 22.3%
Large 58.2%
Dominant scale: macro

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Brown / Black, moderate saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Brown / Black. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.

Light & Dark Structure

Very dark, very low tonal separation

80.5% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal groups are less distinctly separated than in most reference patterns.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads dark at a glance.

Edge Character

Mixed edge structure

Edge density is very low, average detected edge strength is very low, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is very low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to transition more gently than in many reference patterns.

Texture Character

Smoother texture character

Fine texture density is very low, roughness is very low, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.

Shape Character

Less fragmented, more elongated

Effective retained-region fragmentation is very low, while average retained-region elongation is very high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is concentrated into fewer effective regions than in many reference patterns.

Pattern Scale

Large-scale dominant

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as macro. Fine-scale energy is low, mid-scale energy is very low, and large-scale energy is very high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Large visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.

Spatial Distribution

Typical overall spread, with stronger directional imbalance

Spatial information balance is typical, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are high, very high, and very high relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The overall spread of visual activity is fairly typical, but its arrangement is less symmetrical across one or more directions.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with darker or more shadowed overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation. Its lower tonal separation should fit flatter, more blended backgrounds. Its large-scale structure favors backgrounds containing broader visual masses and structural features. Its smoother texture aligns with lower-detail surface texture.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to very bright or pale backgrounds, strongly broken or high-contrast backgrounds, and backgrounds dominated only by tiny repetitive detail.

Breakup Character

The pattern contains relatively few detected edges. Its visible forms are less fragmented and more elongated. The pattern shows relatively stronger spatial asymmetry.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.