CamoMatrix Pattern DNA
Veil Camo
Canyon Hybrid
This pattern stands out most for evenly distributed; mixed, moderate saturation, strongly warm; and large-scale dominant.
The dominant detected color families are Mixed. Its average color saturation is typical compared with the 247-pattern reference set.
What you may notice:
The amount of visible color intensity is fairly typical of the reference set.
38.3% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal-group separation is within the broad middle of the reference set.
What you may notice:
The pattern does not sit near either brightness extreme of the reference set.
Edge density is typical, average detected edge strength is typical, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is typical relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
Boundary strength is broadly typical of the reference set.
Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is typical compared with the reference set.
What you may notice:
Texture variation across the pattern is broadly typical of the reference set.
Effective retained-region fragmentation is typical, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
The effective division of visible regions is broadly typical.
The analyzer classifies dominant scale as macro. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is typical, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
Large visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.
Spatial information balance is high, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are typical, very low, and very low relative to the reference set.
What you may notice:
Visual activity is spread relatively evenly across the sampled pattern.
This pattern appears best aligned with middle-brightness overall backgrounds. Its large-scale structure favors backgrounds containing broader visual masses and structural features.
Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to backgrounds dominated only by tiny repetitive detail.
Visual activity is distributed fairly evenly across the pattern.
How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.
These are the closest measured matches based on Pattern DNA color, tone, texture, shape, scale and layout.
See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.
