Against Late Fall Hardwoods, Approach GT scores 71/100 (), while K2 scores 47/100 ().
Based on color alignment, breakup scale, and texture density, the AI sees an approximate 24-point lean toward Approach GT in this particular environment.
Badlands Approach GT and Killik K2 are both mixed-scale patterns, so they behave similarly from a scale point of view. Both patterns balances micro and macro elements, keeping them fairly steady across different shot distances. They are also similar in overall density, so neither one is dramatically busier or more open.
Badlands Approach GT vs Killik K2
Badlands Approach GT and Killik K2 have been analyzed using our CamoMatrix AI engine, which measures scale, density, and edge behavior directly from the flat pattern artwork. Both land in the mixed-scale category, meaning they balance fine texture with larger breakup blocks instead of living at one extreme. Density is similar, so neither pattern overwhelms the eye or leaves too much empty space. Edge work is alike as well — both leans into smoother, blended transitions, which affects how smoothly (or abruptly) each pattern merges with real brush, trunks, and rocks. Badlands Approach GT's scale index trends a touch higher, making its breakup blocks slightly larger than those in Killik K2. Badlands Approach GT runs a little denser on our readings, while Killik K2 leaves slightly more background showing through — which some hunters prefer in simpler, more open environments. As always, these results come from flat pattern imagery. Real-world performance depends heavily on terrain, season, and how the garments fit and move.
This is a pattern-only comparison from flat artwork. Terrain, season, and real backgrounds will still push one or the other ahead in specific setups.
Learn how the CamoMatrix AI evaluates camouflage patterns
Defines the dominant size of shapes in the pattern.
Indicates which scale range the pattern leans toward overall.
How busy the pattern is with shapes and noise.
How hard or soft shape boundaries are.