Against Late Fall Hardwoods, Veil scores 55/100 (), while Taramac scores 65/100 ().
Based on color alignment, breakup scale, and texture density, the AI sees an approximate 10-point lean toward Taramac in this particular environment.
Bassdash Veil runs mixed-scale, while King of the Mountain Taramac leans more micro-scale, giving each a slightly different feel at various distances. Bassdash Veil balances micro and macro elements, while King of the Mountain Taramac leans toward micro-scale detail, which shifts how each holds up in close cover versus more open sightlines. Density differs slightly: Bassdash Veil runs a bit more open and sparse, while King of the Mountain Taramac stays fairly balanced in texture, changing how much the natural background shows through.
Bassdash Veil vs King of the Mountain Taramac
Bassdash Veil and King of the Mountain Taramac have been analyzed using our CamoMatrix AI engine, which measures scale, density, and edge behavior directly from the flat pattern artwork. Bassdash Veil reads more mixed-scale, while King of the Mountain Taramac trends micro-scale. In the field this usually influences how a pattern holds together in tight cover versus more open terrain. Bassdash Veil runs a bit more open and sparse, while King of the Mountain Taramac stays fairly balanced in texture. Hunters who prefer more background showing may favor the more open one; dense patterns can help disrupt shape in chaotic vegetation. Edge style diverges: Bassdash Veil leans into smoother, blended transitions, while King of the Mountain Taramac mixes both hard and soft edges. Softer edges often melt better into natural backgrounds, while harder edges can create stronger breakup in certain lighting. Bassdash Veil's scale index trends a touch higher, making its breakup blocks slightly larger than those in King of the Mountain Taramac. King of the Mountain Taramac lands slightly higher on the density index, adding a bit more visual texture. That can help in chaotic or brushy terrain where extra breakup is useful. As always, these results come from flat pattern imagery. Real-world performance depends heavily on terrain, season, and how the garments fit and move.
This is a pattern-only comparison from flat artwork. Terrain, season, and real backgrounds will still push one or the other ahead in specific setups.
Learn how the CamoMatrix AI evaluates camouflage patterns
Defines the dominant size of shapes in the pattern.
Indicates which scale range the pattern leans toward overall.
How busy the pattern is with shapes and noise.
How hard or soft shape boundaries are.