Against Late Fall Hardwoods, Vias scores 58/100 (), while Big Sky scores 58/100 ().
Based on color alignment, breakup scale, and texture density, the AI sees an approximate 0-point lean toward Big Sky in this particular environment.
Kuiu Vias and Killik Big Sky are both mixed-scale patterns, so they behave similarly from a scale point of view. Both patterns balances micro and macro elements, keeping them fairly steady across different shot distances. They are also similar in overall density, so neither one is dramatically busier or more open. Killik Big Sky carries a wider spread in scale elements, which can help it stay effective both up close and as animals get farther out.
Kuiu Vias vs Killik Big Sky
Kuiu Vias and Killik Big Sky have been analyzed using our CamoMatrix AI engine, which measures scale, density, and edge behavior directly from the flat pattern artwork. Both land in the mixed-scale category, meaning they balance fine texture with larger breakup blocks instead of living at one extreme. Density is similar, so neither pattern overwhelms the eye or leaves too much empty space. Edge style diverges: Kuiu Vias mixes both hard and soft edges, while Killik Big Sky leans into smoother, blended transitions. Softer edges often melt better into natural backgrounds, while harder edges can create stronger breakup in certain lighting. Kuiu Vias runs a little denser on our readings, while Killik Big Sky leaves slightly more background showing through — which some hunters prefer in simpler, more open environments. Killik Big Sky also shows a higher spread index, suggesting it can maintain its breakup across a slightly broader range of shot distances. As always, these results come from flat pattern imagery. Real-world performance depends heavily on terrain, season, and how the garments fit and move.
This is a pattern-only comparison from flat artwork. Terrain, season, and real backgrounds will still push one or the other ahead in specific setups.
Learn how the CamoMatrix AI evaluates camouflage patterns
Defines the dominant size of shapes in the pattern.
Indicates which scale range the pattern leans toward overall.
How busy the pattern is with shapes and noise.
How hard or soft shape boundaries are.