Forloh Marshfield camouflage pattern
CamoMatrix Pattern DNA

Forloh

Marshfield
This pattern stands out most for brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation; typical overall shape structure; and large-scale dominant.

What Stands Out

Standout #1

Light & Dark Structure

Brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation
Very high overall brightness and very low dark-area share compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #2

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure
Very low shape fragmentation compared with the reference patterns.
Standout #3

Pattern Scale

Large-scale dominant
Very low mid-scale structure compared with the reference patterns.

The Pattern at a Glance

Palette
Primary: tan
Secondary: brown
Warm 100%
Cool 0%
Neutral 1.1%
Light & Dark
Dark 12.3%
Mid 72.4%
Light 15.3%
Dark, mid-tone and light areas measured across the analyzed pattern sample.
Pattern Scale
Fine 33.6%
Mid 23.5%
Large 42.8%
Dominant scale: macro

Pattern DNA

Color Character

Tan / Brown, high saturation, strongly warm

The dominant detected color families are Tan / Brown. Its average color saturation is high compared with the 247-pattern reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern carries stronger color intensity than most reference patterns.

Light & Dark Structure

Brighter than most patterns, typical tonal separation

12.3% of the sampled pattern falls in the governed dark tonal range. Its tonal-group separation is within the broad middle of the reference set.

What you may notice:
The pattern reads bright at a glance.

Edge Character

Softer, weaker edge structure

Edge density is typical, average detected edge strength is low, and the share of qualifying edges classified as hard is low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Detected boundaries tend to transition more gently than in many reference patterns.

Texture Character

Evenly distributed texture

Fine texture density is typical, roughness is typical, and texture uniformity is high compared with the reference set.

What you may notice:
Texture activity is distributed more consistently across the pattern.

Shape Character

Typical overall shape structure

Effective retained-region fragmentation is very low, while average retained-region elongation is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
The visible structure is concentrated into fewer effective regions than in many reference patterns.

Pattern Scale

Large-scale dominant

The analyzer classifies dominant scale as macro. Fine-scale energy is typical, mid-scale energy is very low, and large-scale energy is typical relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Large visual structure makes the strongest contribution to the pattern.

Spatial Distribution

Concentrated, with stronger directional imbalance

Spatial information balance is very low, while left-right, top-bottom, and rotational asymmetry are very high, low, and very low relative to the reference set.

What you may notice:
Visual activity is more concentrated overall and is also arranged less symmetrically across one or more directions.

Where This Pattern Fits

Where It Fits

This pattern appears best aligned with brighter or paler overall backgrounds. Its detected color families align with backgrounds containing brown bark, soil, dead leaves, or dormant vegetation and tan dry grass, vegetation, bark, or exposed earth. Its large-scale structure favors backgrounds containing broader visual masses and structural features. Its more uniform texture aligns with backgrounds whose surface detail remains relatively consistent.

Where It May Struggle

Its measured characteristics may make it less naturally matched to very dark backgrounds and backgrounds dominated only by tiny repetitive detail.

Breakup Character

Detected boundaries tend to transition more softly. Visual activity is distributed less evenly across the pattern.

How to read this:
These observations are derived from Pattern DNA measurements and comparisons with the frozen 247-pattern reference collection. They describe the kinds of visual backgrounds the pattern most closely aligns with; they are not a claim of field-tested performance in a specific location.

Most Similar Patterns

These are the closest measured matches based on Pattern DNA color, tone, texture, shape, scale and layout.

Explore Similar Pattern Traits

See other camouflage patterns that share measured visual characteristics with this pattern.